Search for: All records

Background: DJ-1 is a protein whose mutation causes rare heritable forms of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and is of interest as a target for treating PD and other disorders. This work used high performance affinity microcolumns to screen and examine the binding of small molecules to DJ-1, as could be used to develop new therapeutics or to study the role of DJ-1 in PD. Non-covalent entrapment was used to place microgram quantities of DJ-1 in an unmodified form within microcolumns, which were then used in multiple studies to analyze binding by model compounds and possible drug candidates to DJ-1. Results: Several factors were examined in optimizing the entrapment method, including the addition of a reducing agent to maintain a reduced active site cysteine residue in DJ-1, the concentration of DJ-1 employed, and the entrapment times. Isatin was used as a known binding agent (dissociation constant, ~2.0 µM) and probe for DJ-1 activity. This compound gave good retention on 2.0 cm × 2.1 mm inner diameter DJ-1 microcolumns made under the final entrapment conditions, with a typical retention factor of 14 and elution in ~8 min at 0.50 mL/min. These DJ-1 microcolumns were used to evaluate the binding of small molecules that were selected in silico to bind or not to bind DJ-1. A compound predicted to have good binding with DJ-1 gave a retention factor of 122, an elution time of ~15 min at 0.50 mL/min, and an estimated dissociation constant for this protein of 0.5 µM. Significance: These chromatographic tools can be used in future work to screen additional possible binding agents for DJ-1 or adapted for examining drug candidates for other proteins. This work represents the first time protein entrapment has been deployed with DJ-1, and it is the first experimental confirmation of binding to DJ-1 by a small lead compound selected in silico. 

Today’s challenges with sustainability are driven by complexity, lack necessary information, resist straightforward solutions, span multiple scales, and encompass diverse or sometimes conflicting perspectives. To tackle these issues effectively, research organizations need tools that support and accelerate the integration of disciplinary knowledge across both natural and social sciences so that they can explore and execute workable solutions. Boundary objects are tools that can bring diverse perspectives together through a shared point of focus that is meaningful across different groups and perspectives, enhancing communication between them. Here, we introduce a framework to develop Triple Bottom Line Scenario Sites (TBL Sites) as “convergence” boundary objects and intervention testbeds to support a holistic approach to sustainability research within multidisciplinary and multi-institutional organizations. We describe four key criteria used to identify a potential TBL Site: (1) proximity to researchers, (2) a bounded geographic location encompassing a particular ecosystem, (3) an integrated stakeholder network, and (4) access to existing resources. We explain how TBL Sites may be used to assess research impacts on environmental, economic, and social sustainability goals. Finally, we provide examples of aquatic, agricultural, and urban TBL Sites used by the Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center, demonstrating how these boundary objects facilitate convergence across a large multidisciplinary research team to tackle sustainable phosphorus management. 

The solid-state synthesis of perovskite BiFeO3 has been a topic of interest for decades. Many studies have reported challenges in the synthesis of BiFeO3 from starting oxides of Bi2O3 and Fe2O3, mainly associated with the development of persistent secondary phases such as Bi25FeO39 (sillenite) and Bi2Fe4O9 (mullite). These secondary phases are thought to be a consequence of unreacted Fe-rich and Bi-rich regions, that is, incomplete interdiffusion. In the present work, in situ high-temperature X-ray diffraction is used to demonstrate that Bi2O3 first reacts with Fe2O3 to form sillenite Bi25FeO39, which then reacts with the remaining Fe2O3 to form BiFeO3. Therefore, the synthesis of perovskite BiFeO3 is shown to occur via a two-step reaction sequence with Bi25FeO39 as an intermediate compound. Because Bi25FeO39 and the γ-Bi2O3 phase are isostructural, it is difficult to discriminate them solely from X-ray diffraction. Evidence is presented for the existence of the intermediate sillenite Bi25FeO39 using quenching experiments, comparisons between Bi2O3 behavior by itself and in the presence of Fe2O3, and crystal structure examination. With this new information, a proposed reaction pathway from the starting oxides to the product is presented. 

Chromatography is a robust and reliable separation method that can use various stationary phases to separate complex mixtures commonly seen in metabolomics. This review examines the types of chromatography and stationary phases that have been used in targeted or untargeted metabolomics with methods such as mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. General considerations for sample pretreatment and separations in metabolomics are considered, along with the various supports and separation formats for chromatography that have been used in such work. The types of liquid chromatography (LC) that have been most extensively used in metabolomics will be examined, such as reversed-phase liquid chromatography and hydrophilic liquid interaction chromatography. In addition, other forms of LC that have been used in more limited applications for metabolomics (e.g., ion-exchange, size-exclusion, and affinity methods) will be discussed to illustrate how these techniques may be utilized for new and future research in this field. Multidimensional LC methods are also discussed, as well as the use of gas chromatography and supercritical fluid chromatography in metabolomics. In addition, the roles of chromatography in NMR- vs. MS-based metabolomics are considered. Applications are given within the field of metabolomics for each type of chromatography, along with potential advantages or limitations of these separation methods. 

Abstract The solid‐state synthesis of perovskite BiFeO₃has been a topic of interest for decades. Many studies have reported challenges in the synthesis of BiFeO₃from starting oxides of Bi₂O₃and Fe₂O₃, mainly associated with the development of persistent secondary phases such as Bi₂₅FeO₃₉(sillenite) and Bi₂Fe₄O₉(mullite). These secondary phases are thought to be a consequence of unreacted Fe‐rich and Bi‐rich regions, that is, incomplete interdiffusion. In the present work, in situ high‐temperature X‐ray diffraction is used to demonstrate that Bi₂O₃first reacts with Fe₂O₃to form sillenite Bi₂₅FeO₃₉, which then reacts with the remaining Fe₂O₃to form BiFeO₃. Therefore, the synthesis of perovskite BiFeO₃is shown to occur via a two‐step reaction sequence with Bi₂₅FeO₃₉as an intermediate compound. Because Bi₂₅FeO₃₉and the γ‐Bi₂O₃phase are isostructural, it is difficult to discriminate them solely from X‐ray diffraction. Evidence is presented for the existence of the intermediate sillenite Bi₂₅FeO₃₉using quenching experiments, comparisons between Bi₂O₃behavior by itself and in the presence of Fe₂O₃, and crystal structure examination. With this new information, a proposed reaction pathway from the starting oxides to the product is presented.